Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-12-05 13:47:06 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 6EC704BF9BB1ED5A4FA464ADE807B7C26A181BA79235036B2D0815ACE7A50FF9
Participant Details

Original Note:

The Community Note disputing the post, claiming high efficacy for the vaccine,refers to two studies famous among researchers as a prime example of conflict of interest: QUOTE: "Supported by BioNTech and Pfizer" with dozens of Pfizer employees listed by name as contributors: REF:https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/nejmoa2110345

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1731989229012443225
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 6EC704BF9BB1ED5A4FA464ADE807B7C26A181BA79235036B2D0815ACE7A50FF9
  • createdAtMillis - 1701784026122
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 1
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17319892290124432256EC704BF9BB1ED5A4FA464ADE807B7C26A181BA79235036B2D0815ACE7A50FF9