Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-12-05 09:08:06 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: C0A887F6E33496E4E5EE39423F300D29DAE4D5E2D20258EFE66820E9C8EE484F
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN L’autore del post ha espresso una sua legittima opinione, criticando sia la sentenza (per cui non ha senso usare come fonte la sentenza criticata) sia la legge sulla legittima difesa. Vanno usati i commenti e non le CN per criticare una diversa opinione.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1731962827802280266
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - C0A887F6E33496E4E5EE39423F300D29DAE4D5E2D20258EFE66820E9C8EE484F
  • createdAtMillis - 1701767286831
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1731962827802280266C0A887F6E33496E4E5EE39423F300D29DAE4D5E2D20258EFE66820E9C8EE484F