Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-12-05 16:21:51 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 7246DEE1E7C4ECE91E5DC08715F6C087358FA3B74793F03932CD4BA0A2E4D6B3
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN L’autore del post ha espresso una sua legittima opinione, criticando sia la sentenza (per cui non ha senso usare come fonte la sentenza criticata) sia la legge sulla legittima difesa. Vanno usati i commenti e non le CN per criticare una diversa opinione.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1731962827802280266
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 7246DEE1E7C4ECE91E5DC08715F6C087358FA3B74793F03932CD4BA0A2E4D6B3
  • createdAtMillis - 1701793311510
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17319628278022802667246DEE1E7C4ECE91E5DC08715F6C087358FA3B74793F03932CD4BA0A2E4D6B3