Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-05-16 11:16:16 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: F7A73DD2CF7ACD1403DCA916D6C11134BE567D2769303F69443CC185A566683A
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN. Shocking how many Note writers think their own opinions or side issues should count as objective facts. Get over yourselves. Stop trying to game the system. Proposed Notes break all 3 CN values: https://communitynotes.twitter.com/guide/en/contributing/values

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1731864509881757814
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - F7A73DD2CF7ACD1403DCA916D6C11134BE567D2769303F69443CC185A566683A
  • createdAtMillis - 1715858176574
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1731864509881757814F7A73DD2CF7ACD1403DCA916D6C11134BE567D2769303F69443CC185A566683A