Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-12-05 21:58:50 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: F156D610ADC9F7C0B5FAAF9D9D778EC067827C7E426A0537BE4E10EC70F4172C
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN. Shocking how many Note writers think their own opinions or side issues should count as objective facts. Get over yourselves. Stop trying to game the system. Proposed Notes break all 3 CN values: https://communitynotes.twitter.com/guide/en/contributing/values

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1731864509881757814
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - F156D610ADC9F7C0B5FAAF9D9D778EC067827C7E426A0537BE4E10EC70F4172C
  • createdAtMillis - 1701813530553
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1731864509881757814F156D610ADC9F7C0B5FAAF9D9D778EC067827C7E426A0537BE4E10EC70F4172C