Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-12-05 07:01:21 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 5FD58CD6804F8CA745C5F90DC582E3733940C98A76D290FF0FB985C61C6E75CE
Participant Details

Original Note:

Proposed note citing NBC is flawed. It uses the DOJ’s brief in this case as a source. As a party to the case, the brief isn’t an unbiased, objective source, but an argument given for the Court’s consideration. SCOTUS has ultimate say over which cases it decides to hear https://constitution.congress.gov/browse/essay/artIII-S2-C2-4/ALDE_00001221/ https://www.law.cornell.edu/constitution-conan/article-3/section-2/clause-2/supreme-court-appellate-jurisdiction

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1731850588332126312
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 5FD58CD6804F8CA745C5F90DC582E3733940C98A76D290FF0FB985C61C6E75CE
  • createdAtMillis - 1701759681895
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17318505883321263125FD58CD6804F8CA745C5F90DC582E3733940C98A76D290FF0FB985C61C6E75CE