Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-12-04 18:51:57 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 7D32AC2BFFCBC6F0E5DF58F452012321FC6C6D8E704FA2CC77C605E8FF0823A3
Participant Details

Original Note:

“programmers count starting with 0 and not 1 for efficiency purposes. programming languages are built to count that way too. 0 1 2 3” - @raptalksk (an expert at computer science) https://x.com/raptalksk/status/1731713022710665724?s=46&t=8VxwurEringm2DzbpDM7Gg

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1731722485991666072
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 7D32AC2BFFCBC6F0E5DF58F452012321FC6C6D8E704FA2CC77C605E8FF0823A3
  • createdAtMillis - 1701715917227
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17317224859916660727D32AC2BFFCBC6F0E5DF58F452012321FC6C6D8E704FA2CC77C605E8FF0823A3