Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-12-04 15:47:25 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 052F1116CC6EC9A4AE434EB620C81E7C252E3D795CA5A307F7B88A134D6CBFD4
Participant Details

Original Note:

科学の第一歩は査読を受けて発表される論文であり、再現研究等によって生き残ったものが正しい学説とされます。 https://www.kokusen.go.jp/research/pdf/kk-202212_3.pdf 一方で、疑似科学では、こうした科学的手続きを避け、公開討論などの素人に有利な方法を好みます。 https://togetter.com/li/1775710 https://togetter.com/li/2004577

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1731677789726687365
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 052F1116CC6EC9A4AE434EB620C81E7C252E3D795CA5A307F7B88A134D6CBFD4
  • createdAtMillis - 1701704845131
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1731677789726687365052F1116CC6EC9A4AE434EB620C81E7C252E3D795CA5A307F7B88A134D6CBFD4