Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-12-04 14:41:30 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: C58E8DE72792A57C5D2A01507B2B83F5E016BD5FC38547669F95B81FDB4B222C
Participant Details

Original Note:

Collecting analyzing and confirming the remains of semen could've been considered evidence But it wasn’t collected This is why Israel is depending heavily on second hand sharing of “eye witness testimony” It’s the weakest form of evidence https://x.com/propandco/status/1731557148495069609?s=20

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1731644020307202073
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - C58E8DE72792A57C5D2A01507B2B83F5E016BD5FC38547669F95B81FDB4B222C
  • createdAtMillis - 1701700890173
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1731644020307202073C58E8DE72792A57C5D2A01507B2B83F5E016BD5FC38547669F95B81FDB4B222C