Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-12-04 14:55:22 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: B8C31D7C28A281D789C0570D9D89014B2D98372F0408D8DE096C958C71A741D1
Participant Details

Original Note:

Collecting analyzing and confirming the remains of semen could've been considered evidence But it wasn’t collected This is why Israel is depending heavily on second hand sharing of “eye witness testimony” It’s the weakest form of evidence https://x.com/propandco/status/1731557148495069609?s=20

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1731644020307202073
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - B8C31D7C28A281D789C0570D9D89014B2D98372F0408D8DE096C958C71A741D1
  • createdAtMillis - 1701701722055
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1731644020307202073B8C31D7C28A281D789C0570D9D89014B2D98372F0408D8DE096C958C71A741D1