Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-12-04 14:39:33 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 5ED4A01220BFD98C2C0E2A231E0B0111B78ACB162E1D2B5374217FC1F7E8B285
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN: the post is pointing to the fact that all the present evidence as of today are based on a "third party story". The CN above claims that evidence is showed in the links mentioned but even those talk about "stories" without evidence or Indipendente investigation

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1731610962556227953
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 5ED4A01220BFD98C2C0E2A231E0B0111B78ACB162E1D2B5374217FC1F7E8B285
  • createdAtMillis - 1701700773599
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17316109625562279535ED4A01220BFD98C2C0E2A231E0B0111B78ACB162E1D2B5374217FC1F7E8B285