Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-12-03 01:47:59 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 13FA04FAB069B91F0DD50C6478E521E2B80B22442ADE9DB0FDF6636B73D2AC0F
Participant Details

Original Note:

Anyone still using Wikipedia as a source should be auto removed as a notes contributor. We also require a robust mechanism to remove community notes abusers. Additionally, if you are so unhappy with Twitter (I do not refer to it as X) the solution is simply to leave.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1731084839921885403
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 13FA04FAB069B91F0DD50C6478E521E2B80B22442ADE9DB0FDF6636B73D2AC0F
  • createdAtMillis - 1701568079806
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 173108483992188540313FA04FAB069B91F0DD50C6478E521E2B80B22442ADE9DB0FDF6636B73D2AC0F