Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-12-02 22:53:19 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: C782ED787A89FEE3C32F8B9FBCE05789ECD65D9F8FE9EF64A20C576CA1BCFA64
Participant Details

Original Note:

El haplogrupo mencionado no se encuentra entre los estudiados en la publicación que se ha dado como referencia para denegar el hecho del post. Por lo cual la nota de la comunidad no invalida la afirmación del post. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-017-14761-7

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1731075807232118820
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - C782ED787A89FEE3C32F8B9FBCE05789ECD65D9F8FE9EF64A20C576CA1BCFA64
  • createdAtMillis - 1701557599230
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1731075807232118820C782ED787A89FEE3C32F8B9FBCE05789ECD65D9F8FE9EF64A20C576CA1BCFA64