Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-12-02 19:25:54 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: ECB57D7DF76FB7C84121E0B6CBB079801D6D6EDA78D579A053D90EA84C5A4C1A
Participant Details

Original Note:

The supporting information on researchgate is good but rather technical and most people would not take the time to sift through the information to see if this supports the claim.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1731020172377677893
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - ECB57D7DF76FB7C84121E0B6CBB079801D6D6EDA78D579A053D90EA84C5A4C1A
  • createdAtMillis - 1701545154081
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1731020172377677893ECB57D7DF76FB7C84121E0B6CBB079801D6D6EDA78D579A053D90EA84C5A4C1A