Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-12-02 20:54:37 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: E7E3793BDD0C487908D9E8F412F56316A45C587B007C0F0B48ABC2CCA7B7AE59
Participant Details

Original Note:

The supporting information on researchgate is good but rather technical and most people would not take the time to sift through the information to see if this supports the claim.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1731020172377677893
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - E7E3793BDD0C487908D9E8F412F56316A45C587B007C0F0B48ABC2CCA7B7AE59
  • createdAtMillis - 1701550477069
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1731020172377677893E7E3793BDD0C487908D9E8F412F56316A45C587B007C0F0B48ABC2CCA7B7AE59