Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-12-02 19:45:13 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 81E65B6A28EEF392C99E6F69D342F56DD07C148884234A82D68193A46621E502
Participant Details

Original Note:

The supporting information on researchgate is good but rather technical and most people would not take the time to sift through the information to see if this supports the claim.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1731020172377677893
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 81E65B6A28EEF392C99E6F69D342F56DD07C148884234A82D68193A46621E502
  • createdAtMillis - 1701546313319
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 173102017237767789381E65B6A28EEF392C99E6F69D342F56DD07C148884234A82D68193A46621E502