Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-12-06 05:10:25 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 0CF4D082ABB646D29BA4976053A7488257B59BF0B847C64B2E91E152E4704830
Participant Details

Original Note:

The WattTime/ NYTimes method of assessing Cleanspark emissions used marginal emissions accounting, not actual grid-mix measures. The appropriateness of using marginal accounting to measure electrical consumption has been challenged by the Bitcoin Policy Institute https://www.btcpolicy.org/articles/the-absurdity-of-the-nyts-latest-bitcoin-hit-piece

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1730728738416189557
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 0CF4D082ABB646D29BA4976053A7488257B59BF0B847C64B2E91E152E4704830
  • createdAtMillis - 1701839425069
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17307287384161895570CF4D082ABB646D29BA4976053A7488257B59BF0B847C64B2E91E152E4704830