Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-05-09 13:56:39 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 7ED95AF7B1DE3188DBEF9A01BE4A13C09BC204B26676DC3CB01EDAA6354449DA
Participant Details

Original Note:

This "study" only interviews 44 patients, using data from 15 years ago, and reached a statistically irrelevant conclusion. The stud itself confirms this to be true : https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/0092623X.2023.2281986 We have much better and more recent data which refutes the conclusion this study was "reanalysed" to come to

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1730622657291243675
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 7ED95AF7B1DE3188DBEF9A01BE4A13C09BC204B26676DC3CB01EDAA6354449DA
  • createdAtMillis - 1715262999487
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 1
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17306226572912436757ED95AF7B1DE3188DBEF9A01BE4A13C09BC204B26676DC3CB01EDAA6354449DA