Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-12-02 01:16:07 UTC - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 6E39894AE7345D18A2CE23AAF0A48711D34E2720084280EA506828CBC9B8D562
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN. This is rather rhetorical and based on his opinion. Furthermore, the CN does not note that Omid Scobie has lied in court and is not a credible journalist.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1730599677488165302
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 6E39894AE7345D18A2CE23AAF0A48711D34E2720084280EA506828CBC9B8D562
  • createdAtMillis - 1701479767386
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17305996774881653026E39894AE7345D18A2CE23AAF0A48711D34E2720084280EA506828CBC9B8D562