Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-12-01 18:14:33 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: F0D39F43EA99946D20875E7050DE4F860A41B38E26BF94F3B259F178E6BDDFE9
Participant Details

Original Note:

En la sentencia del TS se expone claramente que ese dictamen del parlamento no incluye la valoración de la idoneidad en el aspecto “jurista de reconocido prestigio “ que exige la LO del consejo de estado. https://www.poderjudicial.es/cgpj/es/Poder-Judicial/Noticias-Judiciales/El-Tribunal-Supremo-anula-el-nombramiento-de-la-presidenta-del-Consejo-de-Estado-por-no-reunir-el-requisito-legal-de--jurista-de-reconocido-prestigio-

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1730505293442818200
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - F0D39F43EA99946D20875E7050DE4F860A41B38E26BF94F3B259F178E6BDDFE9
  • createdAtMillis - 1701454473239
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1730505293442818200F0D39F43EA99946D20875E7050DE4F860A41B38E26BF94F3B259F178E6BDDFE9