Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-11-30 20:35:44 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: C8EC16740A92F4317A051F0917828D106A6BD444E514F480CD479EF985A723F5
Participant Details

Original Note:

Falso! Não há mentira na publicação do perfil @Chief117Br, a conta foi derrubada sem argumentação judicial. Aliás não é a primeira vez que isso ocorre, em dezenas de casos o STF está restringindo direitos sem o devido processo legal. https://www.google.com.br/amp/s/www.gazetadopovo.com.br/opiniao/editoriais/julgamento-8-janeiro-individualizacao-conduta/amp/?espv=1

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1730314412869701938
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - C8EC16740A92F4317A051F0917828D106A6BD444E514F480CD479EF985A723F5
  • createdAtMillis - 1701376544211
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1730314412869701938C8EC16740A92F4317A051F0917828D106A6BD444E514F480CD479EF985A723F5