Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-11-30 17:40:09 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: FD9E3C1BD284B6DF80D79031F2C5B70E02393B29C2BC1126BF47891740A94DFB
Participant Details

Original Note:

While I agree with the note saying this post is a joke and does not need a CN , you cannot say Al-Jazeera is untrustworthy and then link Wikipedia , it's the definition of untrustworthy sources. https://paperpile.com/g/wikipedia-credible-source/#:~:text=Wikipedia%20is%20not%20a%20credible,been%20checked%20before%20publishing%20them.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1730257900117876834
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - FD9E3C1BD284B6DF80D79031F2C5B70E02393B29C2BC1126BF47891740A94DFB
  • createdAtMillis - 1701366009881
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1730257900117876834FD9E3C1BD284B6DF80D79031F2C5B70E02393B29C2BC1126BF47891740A94DFB