Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-12-01 03:41:31 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: E1EE5E1CDB0D05CB289C2F92176E1447AB9F09872A5E9AFDAC7C2170BC1F78EF
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN Several of the proposed notes do not seem to understand non-significance in statistics. If something shows its effects to be 'uncertain', then it is indeed useless, as "useless" could be defined as "usage has no significant effect."

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1730218262540042352
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - E1EE5E1CDB0D05CB289C2F92176E1447AB9F09872A5E9AFDAC7C2170BC1F78EF
  • createdAtMillis - 1701402091681
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1730218262540042352E1EE5E1CDB0D05CB289C2F92176E1447AB9F09872A5E9AFDAC7C2170BC1F78EF