Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-11-30 18:33:19 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 1C8D1E3064F3D9D0A4E45F5B637C3E417F1FCFA57489117069A22288F374B6FB
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN Several of the proposed notes do not seem to understand non-significance in statistics. If something shows its effects to be 'uncertain', then it is indeed useless, as "useless" could be defined as "usage has no significant effect."

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1730218262540042352
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 1C8D1E3064F3D9D0A4E45F5B637C3E417F1FCFA57489117069A22288F374B6FB
  • createdAtMillis - 1701369199409
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17302182625400423521C8D1E3064F3D9D0A4E45F5B637C3E417F1FCFA57489117069A22288F374B6FB