Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-12-01 07:53:33 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: FC2D432F994633C6A88762A4AC8E260A6B1A02E05202C5C28B212A7A50F6DF1C
Participant Details

Original Note:

X, unlike the New York Times, has no journalistic ethics policy because X is not journalism. Therefore, X cannot be held to the standards that the New York Times is expected to maintain, and cannot claim the protections that journalism is granted. https://www.nytimes.com/editorial-standards/ethical-journalism.html

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1730182845786669114
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - FC2D432F994633C6A88762A4AC8E260A6B1A02E05202C5C28B212A7A50F6DF1C
  • createdAtMillis - 1701417213901
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1730182845786669114FC2D432F994633C6A88762A4AC8E260A6B1A02E05202C5C28B212A7A50F6DF1C