Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-12-01 03:50:43 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: ECD4857C6F8BF6C15228389FA02320AE555C947728010C169476C92CB3E17D8F
Participant Details

Original Note:

X, unlike the New York Times, has no journalistic ethics policy because X is not journalism. Therefore, X cannot be held to the standards that the New York Times is expected to maintain, and cannot claim the protections that journalism is granted. https://www.nytimes.com/editorial-standards/ethical-journalism.html

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1730182845786669114
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - ECD4857C6F8BF6C15228389FA02320AE555C947728010C169476C92CB3E17D8F
  • createdAtMillis - 1701402643009
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 1
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 1730182845786669114ECD4857C6F8BF6C15228389FA02320AE555C947728010C169476C92CB3E17D8F