Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-11-30 11:20:18 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: D425F14DE2ABD175837534A35961666EF15E009760AC933CDE68AE8BE9F4C2D5
Participant Details

Original Note:

X, unlike the New York Times, has no journalistic ethics policy because X is not journalism. Therefore, X cannot be held to the standards that the New York Times is expected to maintain, and cannot claim the protections that journalism is granted. https://www.nytimes.com/editorial-standards/ethical-journalism.html

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1730182845786669114
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - D425F14DE2ABD175837534A35961666EF15E009760AC933CDE68AE8BE9F4C2D5
  • createdAtMillis - 1701343218683
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1730182845786669114D425F14DE2ABD175837534A35961666EF15E009760AC933CDE68AE8BE9F4C2D5