Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-12-01 00:29:11 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 3CE526D76EF3967256B95114345835EF4A8910921FF19F3A24FF1CC8757626A8
Participant Details

Original Note:

X, unlike the New York Times, has no journalistic ethics policy because X is not journalism. Therefore, X cannot be held to the standards that the New York Times is expected to maintain, and cannot claim the protections that journalism is granted. https://www.nytimes.com/editorial-standards/ethical-journalism.html

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1730182845786669114
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 3CE526D76EF3967256B95114345835EF4A8910921FF19F3A24FF1CC8757626A8
  • createdAtMillis - 1701390551696
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 17301828457866691143CE526D76EF3967256B95114345835EF4A8910921FF19F3A24FF1CC8757626A8