Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-11-30 08:09:48 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 442FE2F6ED78B42D9B30237C6B4CD09292F916A756588BADB66FDAA31835D8A0
Participant Details

Original Note:

It is important to note that according to the story, in reaching the conclusion in the story the analysis relied on was carried out by Senate Republicans. For some reason the headline has no mention of this. https://x.com/edudarl/status/1729966303492907077?s=46

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1729967952307298717
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 442FE2F6ED78B42D9B30237C6B4CD09292F916A756588BADB66FDAA31835D8A0
  • createdAtMillis - 1701331788529
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 1729967952307298717442FE2F6ED78B42D9B30237C6B4CD09292F916A756588BADB66FDAA31835D8A0