Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-11-29 20:18:09 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: CEF4FFDEB712E5916F39A30A9BACE8DC5FF3A2028144D5254037608BD1B26B7A
Participant Details

Original Note:

A nota proposta ignora o conceito de amplitude de amostra utilizado em pesquisas como esta. Para um universo de milhões de pessoas - como o caso da população do Brasil - a amplitude utilizada é mais que suficiente se a margem de erro esperada for superior a 2%. https://mindminers.com/blog/definir-amostra-de-pesquisa/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1729939775597985910
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - CEF4FFDEB712E5916F39A30A9BACE8DC5FF3A2028144D5254037608BD1B26B7A
  • createdAtMillis - 1701289089548
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1729939775597985910CEF4FFDEB712E5916F39A30A9BACE8DC5FF3A2028144D5254037608BD1B26B7A