Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-11-29 20:11:32 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: C0E27C971DF4D3E42E1FC30C544C5498157508337CCBBC729EB47F17C3ABA569
Participant Details

Original Note:

A nota proposta ignora o conceito de amplitude de amostra utilizado em pesquisas como esta. Para um universo de milhões de pessoas - como o caso da população do Brasil - a amplitude utilizada é mais que suficiente se a margem de erro esperada for superior a 2%. https://mindminers.com/blog/definir-amostra-de-pesquisa/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1729939775597985910
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - C0E27C971DF4D3E42E1FC30C544C5498157508337CCBBC729EB47F17C3ABA569
  • createdAtMillis - 1701288692956
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1729939775597985910C0E27C971DF4D3E42E1FC30C544C5498157508337CCBBC729EB47F17C3ABA569