Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-11-29 19:16:04 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 0125C493FF906B826E40D6C7D5D8A66AA54AB3B568F7C0D71AB141F8D097A577
Participant Details

Original Note:

A nota proposta ignora o conceito de amplitude de amostra utilizado em pesquisas como esta. Para um universo de milhões de pessoas - como o caso da população do Brasil - a amplitude utilizada é mais que suficiente se a margem de erro esperada for superior a 2%. https://mindminers.com/blog/definir-amostra-de-pesquisa/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1729939775597985910
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 0125C493FF906B826E40D6C7D5D8A66AA54AB3B568F7C0D71AB141F8D097A577
  • createdAtMillis - 1701285364726
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17299397755979859100125C493FF906B826E40D6C7D5D8A66AA54AB3B568F7C0D71AB141F8D097A577