Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-11-29 16:05:45 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 7CFE0C6CA196BC534A1600B5EC010449072998BA402E0DFA06F0EE4A7FB9264F
Participant Details

Original Note:

Ce tweet est faux à plusieurs égards : 1. L'UEFA n'a pas émis de communication quant à l'arbitrage de la rencontre PSG - Newcastle ou à la suspension de l'arbitre assigné à la VAR. 2. Les règles UEFA ne correspondent aucunement à ce qui est affirmé dans la fausse citation : https://www.mirror.co.uk/sport/football/news/newcastle-psg-penalty-uefa-rules-31553395

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1729887740559605935
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 7CFE0C6CA196BC534A1600B5EC010449072998BA402E0DFA06F0EE4A7FB9264F
  • createdAtMillis - 1701273945560
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17298877405596059357CFE0C6CA196BC534A1600B5EC010449072998BA402E0DFA06F0EE4A7FB9264F