Birdwatch Archive - Rating Details

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-11-29 18:44:48 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 0E3D7EDE0F7D6318510758C340365FB0DB5689195FC7A7B64E9F564840D0DE20
Participant Details

Original Note:

Ce tweet est faux à plusieurs égards : 1. L'UEFA n'a pas émis de communication quant à l'arbitrage de la rencontre PSG - Newcastle ou à la suspension de l'arbitre assigné à la VAR. 2. Les règles UEFA ne correspondent aucunement à ce qui est affirmé dans la fausse citation : https://www.mirror.co.uk/sport/football/news/newcastle-psg-penalty-uefa-rules-31553395

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

noteId - 1729887740559605935
participantId -
raterParticipantId - 0E3D7EDE0F7D6318510758C340365FB0DB5689195FC7A7B64E9F564840D0DE20
createdAtMillis - 1701283488576
version - 2
agree - 0
disagree - 0
helpful - 0
notHelpful - 0
helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
helpfulOther - 0
helpfulInformative - 0
helpfulClear - 1
helpfulEmpathetic - 0
helpfulGoodSources - 1
helpfulUniqueContext - 0
helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
helpfulImportantContext - 1
helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
notHelpfulOther - 0
notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
notHelpfulOutdated - 0
notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
ratingsId - 17298877405596059350E3D7EDE0F7D6318510758C340365FB0DB5689195FC7A7B64E9F564840D0DE20