Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-11-29 16:44:16 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: D17B924A118EF87734D7D7149CDF0B1053859CBE2D098247B871C7C8853AFC3C
Participant Details

Original Note:

Addressing some of the inacuracies that likely occured in 5000 pages report is useful, but cannot be achieved within the character limit CN has. If the report itself is contested or approved somewhere with good explanations on why it is done so, then that would be a good note

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1729836527981580758
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - D17B924A118EF87734D7D7149CDF0B1053859CBE2D098247B871C7C8853AFC3C
  • createdAtMillis - 1701276256301
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 1
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1729836527981580758D17B924A118EF87734D7D7149CDF0B1053859CBE2D098247B871C7C8853AFC3C