Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-12-01 00:59:41 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 1F19112D4D120B3E8A09EC0F1C770B1E52020173A9CEEAFE49D21A6305D49B79
Participant Details

Original Note:

Addressing some of the inacuracies that likely occured in 5000 pages report is useful, but cannot be achieved within the character limit CN has. If the report itself is contested or approved somewhere with good explanations on why it is done so, then that would be a good note

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1729836527981580758
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 1F19112D4D120B3E8A09EC0F1C770B1E52020173A9CEEAFE49D21A6305D49B79
  • createdAtMillis - 1701392381766
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17298365279815807581F19112D4D120B3E8A09EC0F1C770B1E52020173A9CEEAFE49D21A6305D49B79