Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-11-29 12:28:51 UTC - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 18B6950B09812C7AF80D0FCBBEA02C1DF23F198C1051BB3476C8197E315D3BE6
Participant Details

Original Note:

Addressing some of the inacuracies that likely occured in 5000 pages report is useful, but cannot be achieved within the character limit CN has. If the report itself is contested or approved somewhere with good explanations on why it is done so, then that would be a good note

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1729836527981580758
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 18B6950B09812C7AF80D0FCBBEA02C1DF23F198C1051BB3476C8197E315D3BE6
  • createdAtMillis - 1701260931531
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 172983652798158075818B6950B09812C7AF80D0FCBBEA02C1DF23F198C1051BB3476C8197E315D3BE6