Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-11-28 20:35:11 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: E6E09136506D98598A82A7BD58E4AE89CB3CA228BF1AED08EC010589433F0025
Participant Details

Original Note:

There is no evidence that advertisers don’t mind this content being shown. It is almost certain that they do. In fact, the WSJ who broke the story was itself affected and does seem to mind. https://mashable.com/article/instagram-reels-meta-algorithm-children-sexual-ads

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1729587430242566518
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - E6E09136506D98598A82A7BD58E4AE89CB3CA228BF1AED08EC010589433F0025
  • createdAtMillis - 1701203711591
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1729587430242566518E6E09136506D98598A82A7BD58E4AE89CB3CA228BF1AED08EC010589433F0025