Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-11-30 01:29:54 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: D7E21A62F08FA4AD80B8CB76E08F7F2108A43AC8508F06ED47962B73F93C099A
Participant Details

Original Note:

There is no evidence that advertisers don’t mind this content being shown. It is almost certain that they do. In fact, the WSJ who broke the story was itself affected and does seem to mind. https://mashable.com/article/instagram-reels-meta-algorithm-children-sexual-ads

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1729587430242566518
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - D7E21A62F08FA4AD80B8CB76E08F7F2108A43AC8508F06ED47962B73F93C099A
  • createdAtMillis - 1701307794868
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1729587430242566518D7E21A62F08FA4AD80B8CB76E08F7F2108A43AC8508F06ED47962B73F93C099A