Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-11-28 22:35:57 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 91197F685B3360DB89D727451BBA39AA82A519DAC7D3CD82BF8759496CD410EC
Participant Details

Original Note:

There is no evidence that advertisers don’t mind this content being shown. It is almost certain that they do. In fact, the WSJ who broke the story was itself affected and does seem to mind. https://mashable.com/article/instagram-reels-meta-algorithm-children-sexual-ads

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1729587430242566518
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 91197F685B3360DB89D727451BBA39AA82A519DAC7D3CD82BF8759496CD410EC
  • createdAtMillis - 1701210957356
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 1
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 172958743024256651891197F685B3360DB89D727451BBA39AA82A519DAC7D3CD82BF8759496CD410EC