Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-11-28 21:15:06 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 7EA1DD91DAB7274AC51ECEE5A8D7BD70EB308CCAB3C7BA1FE715B91661690982
Participant Details

Original Note:

There is no evidence that advertisers don’t mind this content being shown. It is almost certain that they do. In fact, the WSJ who broke the story was itself affected and does seem to mind. https://mashable.com/article/instagram-reels-meta-algorithm-children-sexual-ads

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1729587430242566518
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 7EA1DD91DAB7274AC51ECEE5A8D7BD70EB308CCAB3C7BA1FE715B91661690982
  • createdAtMillis - 1701206106051
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 17295874302425665187EA1DD91DAB7274AC51ECEE5A8D7BD70EB308CCAB3C7BA1FE715B91661690982