Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-11-28 20:51:58 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 1B07C2A323DA5CCE64D833D717F180B793809762A5246A1CD14E85869B6F4ABE
Participant Details

Original Note:

There is no evidence that advertisers don’t mind this content being shown. It is almost certain that they do. In fact, the WSJ who broke the story was itself affected and does seem to mind. https://mashable.com/article/instagram-reels-meta-algorithm-children-sexual-ads

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1729587430242566518
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 1B07C2A323DA5CCE64D833D717F180B793809762A5246A1CD14E85869B6F4ABE
  • createdAtMillis - 1701204718593
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17295874302425665181B07C2A323DA5CCE64D833D717F180B793809762A5246A1CD14E85869B6F4ABE