Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-11-28 22:30:52 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 9E1E0266090528031478B80DFAB47360552159ADA89A88CB931E55803B6C044B
Participant Details

Original Note:

A nota em questão é irrelevante, pois é apenas a opinião pessoal do autor Sem contar que a nota na realidade vai de acordo com o tweet, já que afirma que existem notas ruins, assim como o tweet diz

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1729579011368489297
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 9E1E0266090528031478B80DFAB47360552159ADA89A88CB931E55803B6C044B
  • createdAtMillis - 1701210652752
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 1
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17295790113684892979E1E0266090528031478B80DFAB47360552159ADA89A88CB931E55803B6C044B