Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-11-29 10:54:54 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 36A182A396B80D1EBEB5EA210612C9954C6795F55355454C4E442A9523856CAC
Participant Details

Original Note:

A nota em questão é irrelevante, pois é apenas a opinião pessoal do autor Sem contar que a nota na realidade vai de acordo com o tweet, já que afirma que existem notas ruins, assim como o tweet diz

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1729579011368489297
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 36A182A396B80D1EBEB5EA210612C9954C6795F55355454C4E442A9523856CAC
  • createdAtMillis - 1701255294054
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 1
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 172957901136848929736A182A396B80D1EBEB5EA210612C9954C6795F55355454C4E442A9523856CAC