Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-11-28 19:14:44 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 1B917C333D8DA0F1417FBC7965A24EBEA0A4F11C2324FE415B7CA66DC706F4EF
Participant Details

Original Note:

A nota em questão é irrelevante, pois é apenas a opinião pessoal do autor Sem contar que a nota na realidade vai de acordo com o tweet, já que afirma que existem notas ruins, assim como o tweet diz

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1729579011368489297
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 1B917C333D8DA0F1417FBC7965A24EBEA0A4F11C2324FE415B7CA66DC706F4EF
  • createdAtMillis - 1701198884885
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 1
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17295790113684892971B917C333D8DA0F1417FBC7965A24EBEA0A4F11C2324FE415B7CA66DC706F4EF