Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-11-28 22:41:19 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: CB5B273B70410F750562ED46795E87F0289CA3D4DF3E30CA6803747B5A329EC9
Participant Details

Original Note:

A alegação da Nota é extremamente relevante, de modo que deve ser aprovada se comprovada. A questão é que o vídeo do tweet não aparece na matéria apontada como fonte, de modo que não há como ter certeza da veracidade da alegação. Precisamos de uma nota com fonte mais contundente

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1729557818410168695
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - CB5B273B70410F750562ED46795E87F0289CA3D4DF3E30CA6803747B5A329EC9
  • createdAtMillis - 1701211279274
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 1
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1729557818410168695CB5B273B70410F750562ED46795E87F0289CA3D4DF3E30CA6803747B5A329EC9