Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-11-28 13:04:48 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 3617BB3DBEF83E8AFD93186B65061F756E387D04DEAE21D7664B4B09CC2BB48F
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN. El post indica una interpretacion de un articulo de la popuesta de constituciĆ³n, que segun el punto de vista (opinion) de varios abogados, impediria este cobro. Decir que es falso y linkear como fuente un documento de 180 paginas, no se justifica

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1729482098841469324
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 3617BB3DBEF83E8AFD93186B65061F756E387D04DEAE21D7664B4B09CC2BB48F
  • createdAtMillis - 1701176688303
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17294820988414693243617BB3DBEF83E8AFD93186B65061F756E387D04DEAE21D7664B4B09CC2BB48F