Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-11-28 12:26:25 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: FD0E4CAF95829E04146DF0A320C6FAC5CC3CECAFF8107C6FAF7F2051BCD248CA
Participant Details

Original Note:

Instead of citing vetted information Poilievre opted to run with an inflammatory and unconfirmed media report. When questioned on his decision, rather than answer Poilievre chose to attack the reporter. NNN on the post.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1729468626271408340
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - FD0E4CAF95829E04146DF0A320C6FAC5CC3CECAFF8107C6FAF7F2051BCD248CA
  • createdAtMillis - 1701174385631
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 1
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1729468626271408340FD0E4CAF95829E04146DF0A320C6FAC5CC3CECAFF8107C6FAF7F2051BCD248CA