Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-11-28 13:33:56 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: C0AA3616D530859FCF0345266C2B88D2167D3EC3BB1C643C340FC6DEEAFD2A9B
Participant Details

Original Note:

Instead of citing vetted information Poilievre opted to run with an inflammatory and unconfirmed media report. When questioned on his decision, rather than answer Poilievre chose to attack the reporter. NNN on the post.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1729468626271408340
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - C0AA3616D530859FCF0345266C2B88D2167D3EC3BB1C643C340FC6DEEAFD2A9B
  • createdAtMillis - 1701178436578
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1729468626271408340C0AA3616D530859FCF0345266C2B88D2167D3EC3BB1C643C340FC6DEEAFD2A9B