Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-11-28 12:57:22 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: B5D17868D1E79382D4D3B965137651EBD783601F89DD2F6504C4ADF1F45DC8A0
Participant Details

Original Note:

Instead of citing vetted information Poilievre opted to run with an inflammatory and unconfirmed media report. When questioned on his decision, rather than answer Poilievre chose to attack the reporter. NNN on the post.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1729468626271408340
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - B5D17868D1E79382D4D3B965137651EBD783601F89DD2F6504C4ADF1F45DC8A0
  • createdAtMillis - 1701176242902
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1729468626271408340B5D17868D1E79382D4D3B965137651EBD783601F89DD2F6504C4ADF1F45DC8A0